18 años ayudando a las empresas mexicanas
a elegir el mejor software
Sobre Keeper Security
Keeper es la plataforma líder en ciberseguridad para prevenir infracciones de datos relacionadas con contraseñas.
No disponible
No disponible
Filtrar opiniones (505)
Uso
Ordenar por
Filtrar opiniones (505)
Good value with accessible knowledgeable support
Keeper Security: El proveedor más confiable de gestión de credenciales en Nube.
Comentarios: El onboarding de credenciales es bastante versátil, aceptando multiples tipos de extensiones e importaciones nativas de otras soluciones, haciendo la experiencia de migración muy amigable para el administrador.
Puntos a favor:
La libertad de organización de credenciales por equipos, organizaciones y el otorgamiento de acceso - limitaciones a las credenciales.
Contras:
Sería bueno poder hostear en las estaciones finales individualmente las credenciales. Si bien existe el host on premise, es un despliegue de servidor.La otra funcionalidad que podría no ser posible realizarla, es el cambio de región de Vault
Programa bastante bueno
Puntos a favor:
Destacar la sencillez de uso, así como su funcionalidad y seguridad ante amenazas.
Contras:
En la versión gratuita no tiene todas las funcionalidades, pero es normal. Tampoco tiene un precio desorbitado.
Muy bueno
Comentarios: Muy buena recomendada optima y segura
Puntos a favor:
Su simplicidad y seguridad ante cualquier amenaza
Contras:
Su escaneado quizas algo lento pero efectivo
Funciona bien para su objetivo
Comentarios: Cumple su objetivo
Puntos a favor:
Me pareció una buena aplicación, guarda bien las claves. La verdad no hay mucho para decir. Tiene una bonita interface.
Contras:
Si bien tiene muchas más funcionalidades, en la prueba gratis solo te permite un dispositivo.

Alternativas consideradas:
Great value
Puntos a favor:
A huge security benefit, which we didn't see at the competitor we used before - upon login the 2FA code is asked first, before the password. So brute force attacks are completely useless that way.
Contras:
There are some quirks, but they are not critical. Just inconveniences - for example the Android app doesn't match passwords by subdomain (just by main domain), which works in the desktop browser extension. So for projects/clients that have a lot of apps/tools on the same domain, but different subdomains, the filling function becomes useless.
Alternativas consideradas:
Very good but room for improvement
Comentarios: The user experience is better than LastPass, but worse than Bitwarden.
Puntos a favor:
One-time sharing feature very useful Sharing folders with teams and adjusting permissions works very well Great audit statistics Relatively good user interface and user experience
Contras:
Browser extension quite cramped and no way to expand No keyboard shortcut to fill matching credentials (Bitwarden has cmd+shift+L) No option to set how a website URL is matched (Bitwarden has several options) Autofill button injected into form fields often difficult or impossible to click, depending on the website's design
Alternativas consideradas:
Customisable but pricey
Comentarios: Friendly staff and well informed of the product offerings.
Puntos a favor:
The features are quite customisable and enable an organisation like ours to work within a specific requirements of operation.
Contras:
The price is not competitive and unaffordable for our NGO. The API is an additional cost. We may need to leave Keeper purley on the grounds of cost.
Keeper is a keeper (of passwords)
Comentarios: Keeper was a seamless solution when LastPass blew up in our faces. The business relationship is simple, the product is of high quality and my team uses it as intended. For a password manager, that's my biggest ask. We aren't doing anything with PAM or automated changes today but those capabilities exist when we're ready for them.
Puntos a favor:
It is inexpensive, very easy to use and very secure. Between the mobile app and browser plug-in, I'm able to easily fill in passwords without the risk posed by auto-fill from other vendors. Sharing and organizing secrets is also simple with support for group memberships and shared folders.
Contras:
Nothing comes to mind. We've turned on some of their advanced security features like device approval and still no real issues.
Alternativas consideradas:
We have loved KeeperSecurity.
Comentarios: Fantastic improvement in our security. We've never felt better about our password protocols.
Puntos a favor:
Security and ease of use, and sharing of passwords across the team with only one member managing the changes.
Contras:
Daily 2FA on the mobile device. Also, the new popup to change passwords makes it harder to edit when certain sites have restrictions on which special characters one must use.
Alternativas consideradas:
Stay away. Over promise and under delivery.
Comentarios: Very very bad. Would NOT recommend to anyone.
Puntos a favor:
Enterprise features. Also the paradigm of password ownership, even when shared with others.
Contras:
Charged renewal even after telling sales that we did not want to renew (no option to cancel online). Did not keep the promised price after we migrated from competitor. No one liked to use their apps
Alternativas consideradas:
Good solution for my small business
Puntos a favor:
User friendliness and ability to share passwords
Contras:
Set-up was time consuming, mostly because I didn't understand how. At first, I felt like I had to become an expert in your product in order to be successful, which I don't think should be necessary. I would have liked to have a 10 minute call with someone that could tell me exactly what to do or do it for me. I don't recall that being an option.
Cyber Security Manager
Puntos a favor:
The security features are top notch. I don't worry about the data in the platform.
Contras:
The admin console is a bit clunky. It's getting better, but it's not the most intuitive.
Alternativas consideradas:
Most Valuable Password Manager + PAM
Comentarios: By combining password management and privileged account management, we are now able to have our IT groups not errantly stored privileged accounts in their personal password vaults. We also leveraged the connection manager and are finally getting away from old school "jump boxes"
Puntos a favor:
Keeper's password manager and browser plug-in was favored by our end user pilot test group and by IT as easy to use. Admins loved the policy control and integration with Okta for SSO and MFA. We believe combining password management and privileged account managed into a single user interface removed a significant barrier to adoption. Previous PAM solution was a separate tool. Cost of Keeper was mid-tier compared to other popular choices, but they were willing to negotiate to win the business.
Contras:
Windows service account and scheduled task discovery is a missing piece of PAM we hope to see in the future. Compliance Manager features should be included in the product without having the pay extra.
Keeper is perfect
Puntos a favor:
Easy to use and easy to implement, Good functions
Contras:
Nothing to say about, we found nothing negative
Keeper for all passwords
Comentarios: We used this for all customer passwords so the engineers who needs to have access to the customer passwords get access based on Azure Groups, it's always safe with them!
Puntos a favor:
Browser plugin is very easy, app on Windows is also very easy to use. Good quality, good price, Azure integration, MFA based on SSO with Office 365, secure data storage
Contras:
Nothing, it works fine for us and we save all password in it
Alternativas consideradas:
Good value but not exceptional
Comentarios: I have no reason to doubt Keeper from a security point of view, and it's serviceable from a usability point of view, so it's okay overall. For it to become a truly exceptional tool, it would need to add the missing features that competitors have and tweak the UI a bit so that it's a bit more modern. (Like, can we get rid of the "Encryption Enabled" message? It's silly to think a password manager wouldn't use encryption in this day and age.)
Puntos a favor:
Keeper is reasonably priced compared to the competitors we considered. Unlike virtually all SaaS vendors, they publish detailed release notes for all of their component products, which is *super* nice. (I just wish they included RSS feeds with those release notes so I didn't have to make my own...) Keeper is compatible with many different platforms, including Linux (Keeper desktop) and Safari (Keeper browser extension). A lot of competitors couldn't give a whit about products like Linux and Safari.
Contras:
It's been years since we signed up with Keeper, but it still has some fairly basic limitations that it needs to overcome. For instance, in shared folders, it'd be nice to have separate sharing settings for subfolders. The UI as a whole is just not as refined as something like 1Password.
Keeper Ease
Puntos a favor:
place to go to get what I need to get into my sites
Contras:
need a tutorial, because I'm not Mr. technologo
Highly Recommend Keeper Security
Puntos a favor:
Being able to edit passwords; being able to choose password lengths and complexities. I like the different record types--i.e. passwords versus credit card data.
Contras:
Price / per user cost. The complexity of recovering the admin password--I understand it, but it's complicated.
Most Useful Program on My Computer
Puntos a favor:
Keeper makes powerful passwords that protect my information so very simple. I love the generate password function, how easy it is to create a new record, and the autofill option. I even use it to keep reminders for specific websites and apps.
Contras:
I don't know of any cons - Keeper makes my life easier everyday.
Alternativas consideradas:
Great Product for small Firms with high security need
Comentarios: Like it.
Puntos a favor:
Very easy to use and well accepted by users.
Contras:
Help could be a little better. Did Not find answers to some questions.
Jayson's Review
Comentarios: Good overall
Puntos a favor:
It is a secure place to manage all of our users passwords
Contras:
Quirky issues because of the wide range of websites and places it is used
Review of Keeper
Comentarios: It's ok. The website address doesn't always work properly and sometimes it's pounding your browser asking if you want to use a password that's wrong. Very annoying
Puntos a favor:
It's ok to use. Usability can be cumbersome.
Contras:
Support. I've reached out to sales many times to get a quote for the SSO version that syncs with AAD. Buying this upgrade seems next to impossible for some reason. I don't really need a quote.
Best money a small business can spend
Comentarios: I consider Keeper the first and best weapon in our cybersecurity strategy. As a small business with remote employees, we rely on the product daily to manage access to myriad systems. This platform allows me oversight and easy adoption, while providing all of the features I would expect from a top shelf security product.
Puntos a favor:
We have found Keeper to be an easy and effective way for us to manage our company's password standards and security. Easy to share records with employees and generate passwords and eliminate reuse. I also love the zero-knowledge platform - our employees feel comfortable knowing they can use if for their personal passwords also, which helped with adoption.
Contras:
Some of the browser extensions were a bit buggy in the beginning but they have been sorted out. The same with the new iPhone app. Nothing huge and all were corrected within an appropriate amount of time.

Trusty Password Management for a Reasonable Price
Comentarios: I am still getting used to Keeper. I would say, on the whole I am satisfied with the purchase. There are some things that I either need to learn to use better or that may not work as advertised.
Puntos a favor:
I like that I can maintain multiple credentials in a single location and that browser extensions are available for most browsers. I also like that for a single record, it is possible to enter multiple urls where the credential might be required.
Contras:
As mentioned, it is not uncommon for me to create or update a record in my Keeper vault only to find that the browser extensions have not synchronized. This can result in account lockouts if the auto-fill function is enabled for the url. The update password functionality does not work as desired/expected which means I mostly switch back and forth between Keeper and the current browser tab to take care of things. Also, the browser extension does not always recognize when there is an existing record for the site being updated which can be a bit confusing at times.
Simple, Elegant Password Management that I have used for 2+ years
Comentarios: I have used the app for over two years and have found it to be a time-efficient and safe way to store my passwords for ALL my online accounts. I also store other important information on there (like SS # etc)
Puntos a favor:
Browser App Extension allows you to have passwords automatically entered. Such a time saver Seamless integration and syncing between devices I guess we have no way of knowing if the App is REALLY safe but if you goto keeper.com they have extensive documentation on how they encrypt and store your data, their security disclosure and their certifications. I guess if you're really worried you should store your passwords under your mattress at home.
Contras:
Sometimes the Browser App Extension Popup does not bring up the correct login. An example of this occurs when you are on an ecommerce site and taken to a 3rd party payment site (ie Paypal Popup) but you retain the shops URL. As Keeper does URL matching to determine what password to retrieve this can be an issue...you need to open the Vault interface and get your paypal password. A way to select what username/password combo from the popup dialog would make things easier.