--- description: ¿Qué es y para qué sirve invideo? Lee opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características, precios de planes, ventajas y desventajas. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: ¿Qué es invideo? - Reseñas, precios y funciones - Capterra México 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Programas para editar videos](/directory/20022/video-editing/software) > [invideo](/software/180680/invideo) # invideo Canonical: https://www.capterra.mx/software/180680/invideo Página: 1 de 18\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.mx/software/180680/invideo?page=2) > InVideo te ayuda a transformar tu contenido en vídeos excelentes. > > Veredicto: 409 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.5/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa invideo? InVideo te ayuda a transformar tu contenido en vídeos excelentes. Ayuda a empresas de medios de comunicación, pequeñas empresas y marcas que quieren involucrar a su audiencia con el poder del contenido en vídeo. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.5/5** | 409 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.5/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.6/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.5/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.5/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: invideo - **Ubicación**: San Francisco, EE. UU. ## Contexto comercial - **Precio inicial**: USD 100.00 - **Modelo de precios**: (versión gratuita disponible) - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-5,000, 5,001-10,000, 10,000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop) - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Estados Unidos, India ## Funciones - AI Voices - Animación - Animación y transiciones - Arrastrar y soltar - Biblioteca de contenidos - Captura de vídeo - Compartir en redes sociales - Content Generation - Creación de marca personalizable - Creación de vídeos - De texto a vídeo - Edición de vídeo - Gestión de contenidos - Gestión de vídeos - Herramientas de colaboración - IA y aprendizaje automático - Mediateca - Modelos - Personalization and Recommendation - Procesamiento de lenguaje natural - Prompt Engineering - Subida masiva - Superposición de marcas - Superposición de texto - Varios idiomas - Video Templates - Voice Cloning ## Integraciones (en total: 1) - Brightcove ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia 24/7 - Chat ## Categoría - [Programas para editar videos](https://www.capterra.mx/directory/20022/video-editing/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Programas para editar videos](https://www.capterra.mx/directory/20022/video-editing/software) - [Software para gestión de vídeo](https://www.capterra.mx/directory/30754/video-management/software) - [Programas para hacer videos](https://www.capterra.mx/directory/31677/video-making/software) - [Software para generación de videos con IA](https://www.capterra.mx/directory/34376/ai-video-generator/software) - [Software de texto a voz](https://www.capterra.mx/directory/33256/text-to-speech/software) ## Alternativas 1. [CreateStudio](https://www.capterra.mx/software/203897/create-studio) — 4.8/5 (578 reviews) 2. [Movavi Video Editor Plus](https://www.capterra.mx/software/1011548/movavi-video-editor-plus) — 4.8/5 (1134 reviews) 3. [Pictory](https://www.capterra.mx/software/1012384/pictory) — 4.8/5 (163 reviews) 4. [Camtasia](https://www.capterra.mx/software/203013/camtasia) — 4.5/5 (451 reviews) 5. [Loom](https://www.capterra.mx/software/191187/loom) — 4.7/5 (520 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "All IN with InVideo" — 5.0/5 > **Wayne** | *10 de agosto de 2025* | Entretenimiento | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: It makes producing YouTube content so easy. I generally drop in my pre-written script and storyboard and it creates the perfect results. > > **Puntos en contra**: Be nice is I could start the creation process with an audio file. I create podcast for other platforms like Spotify and would then like to take that audio as the baseline and have the video generated from there. > > Very good. I started with very little knowedge - if any, and by using the edit function withint the InVideo platform I have come to understand the structure of video production which has also helped me with other platforms like Meld Studio and CapCut. ----- ### "Invideo review" — 5.0/5 > **Pet** | *18 de octubre de 2025* | Animación | Valoración de la recomendación: 5.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: That you can use the AI Twin feature to clone your voice and have your own voice become all of your voiceovers > > **Puntos en contra**: That every new feature they add you have to either upgrade your subscription or mostly buy add- ons to use > > It use to be the best most affordable AI product to use that's no longer the case. I only longer love this product ----- ### "Misleading Claims and Unusable Results Despite Additional Costs" — 1.0/5 > **Shawn** | *15 de abril de 2026* | Gestión de organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro | Valoración de la recomendación: 0.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The concept and marketing are very appealing. The idea of being able to quickly create videos from simple prompts using your own content is exactly what we were looking for as a small nonprofit > > **Puntos en contra**: The platform did not function as advertised. It failed to reliably use uploaded assets, generated incorrect and mismatched visuals, and required significant editing despite claiming none would be needed. The credit system made it costly to even attempt basic functionality, as credits were consumed without producing usable results. Even after acknowledging these issues, support denied a same-day refund. > > We are a small nonprofit organization and purchased InVideo based on its advertised ability to “create videos without limit” and generate complete videos from simple prompts with “no editing needed.” Within the first couple of hours of using the platform—and during our very first video attempt—it became clear that the product does not deliver on these claims. The system did not reliably use our uploaded assets, did not follow the structure we provided, and generated visuals that were completely mismatched to the content. Scenes included incorrect imagery, blank or incorrect color screens, and unanimated elements where animation was expected. The result was not just slightly off—it was entirely unusable. The platform also claims that videos can be created “just like asking a human editor” and that “no editing is needed.” This was not our experience. The output was nowhere close to usable and would have required significant manual editing, defeating the purpose of the tool. Additionally, the “create videos without limit” claim is misleading. Video generation is heavily restricted by a credit system. While attempting to create a single video, we were prompted to purchase additional credits. We spent over $100 more in good faith, expecting this would resolve the issue. Instead, those credits were consumed without producing a usable result. At that point, the only option presented was to purchase even more credits to try again, despite the fact that the underlying issues were clearly not resolved. This creates a situation where users must continue paying simply to attempt basic functionality. InVideo also advertises a 7-day money-back guarantee. However, in practice, this guarantee is effectively unusable. In our case, simply attempting to generate a video—without downloading or exporting any usable content—consumed credits and made us ineligible for a refund. Since the platform did not produce a usable result, there was no meaningful way to evaluate the service without immediately forfeiting refund eligibility. Importantly, customer support acknowledged that the platform “didn’t perform as expected” and specifically referenced issues such as incorrect visuals, mismatched scenes, and difficulty using uploaded assets—all of which we experienced. Despite this acknowledgment, and despite requesting a refund the same day after only a few hours of use, our refund request was denied based solely on policy. This was not a case of extended use or dissatisfaction over time. It was immediately clear that the platform could not deliver what was advertised, yet no refund was offered or considered. In summary: The platform did not deliver on its core advertised functionality The “no limits” claim is constrained by a costly credit system Additional purchases did not resolve fundamental issues The generated output was not usable without extensive editing The 7-day guarantee is effectively voided by attempting to use the product The company acknowledged these issues but still denied a same-day refund We strongly encourage other organizations—especially nonprofits or small teams with limited budgets—to proceed with caution and fully understand the limitations and costs before committing. This was a costly and disappointing experience for our organization. ----- ### "Avoid Invideo.....Low quality inaccurate videos" — 1.0/5 > **Gary** | *5 de enero de 2026* | Administración educativa | Valoración de la recomendación: 0.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The concept that they allegedly create good videos caught my attention, but it was a marketing gimmick and not worth wasting your money on this company. > > **Puntos en contra**: Low quality inaccurate videos with poor customer service. They were provided with a script and subtitles. The subtitles were inaccurate and illegible. > > Avoid Invideo at all costs. They provide low quality unusable videos. I observed mixed reviews before subscribing, but thought I would give it a shot. I typed in a script for a short 10-second video with subtitles. The subtitle wording was inaccurate and illegible. I made a request to edit and correct the video, and they wanted more credits to fix their mistake, so I was left with an unusable video. I then tried to produce a 3-minute video with a full step by step script, and it kept freezing up stating it couldn't complete the request. I reached out within 7 days requesting a refund, and was told since I created a video, even an unusable one, I didn't qualify for a refund. Don't waste your money on this sub-par company. I'll be using Grok moving forward. ----- ### "Quick and effective creation of videos" — 5.0/5 > **Nilsa** | *26 de marzo de 2025* | Aprendizaje en línea | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Ease of use, affordability and I love the using my script feature. > > **Puntos en contra**: not too much freedom to use media and reuse of same media on several videos. > > Is a good experience because I can quickly create videos to use in classroom. ----- Página: 1 de 18\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.mx/software/180680/invideo?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.mx/software/180680/invideo) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Datos estructurados