17 años ayudando a las empresas mexicanas
a elegir el mejor software
Sobre Sigrid
Una visión general integral de todo tu panorama de software, que ayuda a los líderes a crear un software adaptado al futuro que permita el crecimiento.
What I like most is that it's easy to use, the set-up wasn't too complex.
Customizability of what is measured and how this works with architecture goals is very low. Immediate feedback for developers missing.
Filtrar opiniones (16)
Uso
Ordenar por
Filtrar opiniones (16)
Still exploring
Comentarios: I am a new user. Our company just enrolled Sigrid, and I am still exploring the website.
Puntos a favor:
Nice overview of the software quality of all the applications within our company.
Contras:
I am still a new user, so I didn't find anything negative yet.
Keeping a good eye on Open Source and Low Code software development efforts
Comentarios: Although getting pseude code for all low code diagrams from our Mendix app made me a bit skeptical in the beginning, I started to appreciate the overall features Sigrid provides and the ability to review both Open Source and Mendix low code apps. As I outlined in the cons, there should be more credit/focus in Mendix Low Code developed apps when as little Java as possible is used, benefitting fully from Low Code assesments. I personally don't appreciate when Java is seen as the way to go in Low Code software development.
Puntos a favor:
We use Sigrid for the following objectives (in order of top prio first): - Monitor and avoid vulnerabilities in libraries we use - Assess and improve code & low code quality - Assess Software Architectures and avoid/minimize module entanglements - Benchmark our Open Source and Low Code developments - Focus on good enough development and not over engineer
Contras:
- In the Architecture Overview of your App, the Scores for Technology Stack give you 2.8 stars for all developments you do in Mendix Low Code (and we use Mendix QSM, the Mendix version of Sigrid) and 5.4 stars for any Java code you use in your Mendix app, this is crazy and should be solved. In a Mendix app you should expect the opposite, 2.8 stars if you use Java instead of the Low code way of developing. If this can be improved, Sigrid is a great tool.
Respuesta de Software Improvement Group
hace 12 meses
Dear Rob, Thanks for your useful feedback and for taking the time to write a review for Sigrid. We would love to learn more about your experience and how we can make it even better. Please feel free to reach out to us at https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/contact/ with any further comments, concerns, or suggestions you wish to share. We are always here to help and are looking forward to making your experience even more positive!
Highly unsatisfying experience with code quality monitoring software
Puntos a favor:
Some quality aspects are monitorable, even though not all the essential ones
Contras:
Customizability of what is measured and how this works with architecture goals is very low. Immediate feedback for developers missing
Respuesta de Software Improvement Group
hace 12 meses
Dear Jesper, Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback regarding our platform. We genuinely appreciate your insights as they are crucial for our continuous improvement. Our team is constantly working to enhance our software's capabilities and ensure it aligns more closely with the diverse needs of different users. We are committed to delivering a product that not only meets but exceeds your expectations. If you're open to it, we would greatly appreciate the opportunity to discuss your experience in more detail. This could help us understand your specific needs and preferences better, allowing us to address them more effectively in future updates. Please feel free to reach out to us at https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/contact/. Your continued satisfaction is our top priority, and we are here to support you. Thank you once again for your review. We look forward to the opportunity to improve your experience with our software.
Staying ahead of threads and problems with ease of use
Comentarios: We have been using it for months now without any issue, we'll continue to use it and maybe reach out to improve and add new features.
Puntos a favor:
It help us to evaluate and measure the entire scope of things when developing and maintaining or software and platforms. That's very helpful
Contras:
It can be a bit overwhelming at first, but once you get to know it, you have an amazing tool
Good product to improve quality for developers and architects
Puntos a favor:
Sigrid provides actionable points of improvement, and you can track improvement well in time.
Contras:
It tends to forget your preferences you select on overview pages, which makes it a bit annoying when you navigate back and forth. The Code explorer could be made more user friendly.
Respuesta de Software Improvement Group
hace 12 meses
Dear Guido, Thanks for your useful feedback and for taking the time to write a review for Sigrid. We would love to learn more about your experience and how we can make it even better. Please feel free to reach out to us at https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/contact/ with any further comments, concerns, or suggestions you wish to share. We are always here to help and are looking forward to making your experience even more positive!
A Vital Resource for Strategic Software Management
Puntos a favor:
In the nutshell, providing constant insights into the health of our software systems was delivered by Sigrid. With extensive coverage for more than 300 technologies, detailed source code analytics, and a quality and productivity boost, it worked wonders for our code.
Contras:
Sigrid's user interface can sometimes be a bit unintuitive, mostly when moving around several features within the product. Just a minor glitch, this can disrupt the user experience for a moment.
Sigrid review
Puntos a favor:
What I like most is that it's easy to use, the set-up wasn't too complex. It's intuitive and it has a lot of features. We use it both to identify vulnerabilities and for code quality, it's impressive for how many things it can scan the code for. For example, it found outdated packages with vulnerabilities and configurations with potential security risks. It also provides links with more information for each finding and ways to fix them.
Contras:
There were a few cases where for some vulnerabilities it found a few places where they occurred, but didn't find all the places, so you have to be careful and check all the code.
revieuw of sigrid
Comentarios: Overall Sigrid is a very good product for real professionals.
Puntos a favor:
Sigrid is a good tool to help manage and maintain your code. It gives a good overvieuw of what is good and not so good. you can steer teams towards a more robust implementation of your software.
Contras:
To manage teams you need a good understanding of the information it provides. you can not just put a random manager on this and expect it to work. Sigrid is an advanced tool for advanced teams for business that really want there products to work.
Respuesta de Software Improvement Group
hace 12 meses
Dear Joost, Thanks for your useful feedback and for taking the time to write a review for Sigrid. We would love to learn more about your experience and how we can make it even better. Please feel free to reach out to us at https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/contact/ with any further comments, concerns, or suggestions you wish to share. We are always here to help and are looking forward to making your experience even more positive!
Sigrid for Software Maintainability
Comentarios: Overall, a great product for keeping your code quality in check with quantifiable metrics
Puntos a favor:
Great detection, shows files of interest, gives some suggestions to improve
Contras:
One downside was that it felt the comparison of maintainability score of new code (on PR) to baseline wasn’t what we expected. The calculations seemed not to factor in untouched (N/A) columns which underestimated improvements (correct me if im interpreting the results wrong)
Respuesta de Software Improvement Group
hace 12 meses
Dear Justin, Thanks for your useful feedback and for taking the time to write a review for Sigrid. We would love to learn more about your experience and how we can make it even better. Please feel free to reach out to us at https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/contact/ with any further comments, concerns, or suggestions you wish to share. We are always here to help and are looking forward to making your experience even more positive!
Tracking maintainability with Sigrid
Puntos a favor:
The quick feedback you get whenever you push code. It is very easy to go to the refactoring candidates and see where the biggest improvements can be made. But it is also very useful to go to specific files to see how to improve maintainability for this piece of code.
Contras:
Unfortunately, detecting component dependencies does not work very well for our PHP Symfony projects because of the framework's dependency injection mechanism.
Le correcteur de code source
Comentarios: Sigrid en terme de rendement est efficace je suis tout à fait d'accord avec ce système d'amélioration continue de la qualité des applications et la manière professionnelle de le faire. S'il fallait recommencer avec Sigrid je le choisirais encore
Puntos a favor:
Ce que j'apprécie le plus dans Sigrid c'est le processus d'accès au code source qui me permet d'agir sur les différents bug
Contras:
Il faut juste être attendre l'application peut ne pas bien marcher si on ne s'y connait pas
A useful tool with some room for improvement
Puntos a favor:
Sigrid can help you improve the quality of your code. Beyond duplication, size and complexity issues that a developer can easily locate by himself, also issues concering the coupling and dependencies issues
Contras:
There are issues concerning the specificity of each programming language or framework, i.e. sigrid appears duplication issues in HTML which a developer cannot avoid
Respuesta de Software Improvement Group
hace 12 meses
Dear Theodosios, Thanks for your useful feedback and for taking the time to write a review for Sigrid. We would love to learn more about your experience and how we can make it even better. Please feel free to reach out to us at https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/contact/ with any further comments, concerns, or suggestions you wish to share. We are always here to help and are looking forward to making your experience even more positive!
Score applications
Puntos a favor:
I like to my check my applications for correct syntax
Contras:
I do not like the maintability risk checks
Respuesta de Software Improvement Group
hace 12 meses
Dear Themistoklis, Thanks for your useful feedback and for taking the time to write a review for Sigrid. We would love to learn more about your experience and how we can make it even better. Please feel free to reach out to us at https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/contact/ with any further comments, concerns, or suggestions you wish to share. We are always here to help and are looking forward to making your experience even more positive!
I can easily recommend Sigrid for any software company
Puntos a favor:
Code review screens are informative and help you write better code.
Contras:
There could be better explanations on what the suggestion is about, why it is really a problem, and how to solve it with a simple example.
Respuesta de Software Improvement Group
hace 12 meses
Dear Furkan, Thanks for your useful feedback and for taking the time to write a review for Sigrid. We would love to learn more about your experience and how we can make it even better. Please feel free to reach out to us at https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/contact/ with any further comments, concerns, or suggestions you wish to share. We are always here to help and are looking forward to making your experience even more positive!
Portfolio Manager
Comentarios:
Great.
I still learning how to extract the best from the tool.
Puntos a favor:
QSM is a powerful tool that goes deep in the application functionalities. We are still in the beginning of use, basically we used to identify security breachs into our starter app and we fixed it.
Contras:
I was expecting more from bill of materials. I wish QSM could help to extract the bill of materials from the application, but only Mendix components. If you go to bill of materials, if shows all the components, even the internal components.
Respuesta de Software Improvement Group
hace 12 meses
Dear Eder, Thanks for your useful feedback and for taking the time to write a review for Sigrid. We would love to learn more about your experience and how we can make it even better. Please feel free to reach out to us at https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/contact/ with any further comments, concerns, or suggestions you wish to share. We are always here to help and are looking forward to making your experience even more positive!
The best review ever
Puntos a favor:
One of Sigrid's standout features is its intuitive interface, making it incredibly user-friendly even for those not tech-savvy.
Contras:
Nothing everything is the best I haver viewed.
Respuesta de Software Improvement Group
hace 12 meses
Dear Pavlos, Thanks for your useful feedback and for taking the time to write a review for Sigrid. We would love to learn more about your experience and how we can make it even better. Please feel free to reach out to us at https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/contact/ with any further comments, concerns, or suggestions you wish to share. We are always here to help and are looking forward to making your experience even more positive!