--- description: ¿Qué es y para qué sirve HackerRank? Lee opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características, precios de planes, ventajas y desventajas. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: ¿Qué es HackerRank? - Reseñas, precios y funciones - Capterra México 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Herramientas de pruebas de selección](/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) > [HackerRank](/software/143549/hackerrank) # HackerRank Canonical: https://www.capterra.mx/software/143549/hackerrank Página: 1 de 5\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.mx/software/143549/hackerrank?page=2) > Permite a los reclutadores tecnológicos obtener, seleccionar, entrevistar y contratar el mejor talento técnico. > > Veredicto: 89 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.6/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa HackerRank? Cualquier empresa que necesite contratar talento técnico, como ingenieros, programadores, administradores de Linux, analistas de bases de datos, desarrolladores de dispositivos móviles entre otros. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.6/5** | 89 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.6/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.4/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.3/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.5/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: HackerRank - **Constitución**: 2012 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio inicial**: USD 199.00 - **Modelo de precios**: (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-5,000, 5,001-10,000, 10,000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop) - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Afganistán, Albania, Alemania, Andorra, Angola, Anguila, Antigua y Barbuda, Arabia Saudita, Argelia, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaiyán, Bahamas, Bangladés, Barbados, Baréin, Belice y 208 más ## Funciones - Biblioteca de preguntas - Biblioteca de pruebas predefinidas - Clasificación automática - Comparación de candidatos - Creación de informes/análisis - Creación de test/quiz - Evaluación - Evaluación de habilidades - Gestión de candidatos - Gestión de entrevistas - Gestión de evaluaciones - Gestión de modelos - Herramientas de colaboración - Importación y exportación de datos - Modelos - Métricas de rendimiento - Preguntas personalizables - Programación de entrevistas - Prueba previa a la contratación - Pruebas en línea - Seguimiento de candidatos - Tests personalizables - Tests/Evaluaciones ## Integraciones (en total: 6) - Avature - Greenhouse - JazzHR - Jobvite - Lever - Workable ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia telefónica - Asistencia 24/7 - Chat ## Categoría - [Herramientas de pruebas de selección](https://www.capterra.mx/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Herramientas de pruebas de selección](https://www.capterra.mx/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) - [Software de evaluación](https://www.capterra.mx/directory/31117/assessment/software) - [Sistema de seguimiento de candidatos](https://www.capterra.mx/directory/30060/applicant-tracking/software) - [Software de reclutamiento](https://www.capterra.mx/directory/30602/recruiting/software) ## Alternativas 1. [ZipRecruiter](https://www.capterra.mx/software/130706/ziprecruiter) — 4.2/5 (10939 reviews) 2. [NEOGOV](https://www.capterra.mx/software/75288/neogov) — 4.5/5 (850 reviews) 3. [Indeed for Employers](https://www.capterra.mx/software/161381/indeed) — 4.5/5 (7593 reviews) 4. [Zoho Recruit](https://www.capterra.mx/software/125768/zoho-recruit) — 4.5/5 (1253 reviews) 5. [CEIPAL ATS](https://www.capterra.mx/software/135562/ceipal-ats) — 4.6/5 (1261 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Hackerrank for Interviews and practice solutions" — 4.0/5 > **Manish** | *10 de junio de 2026* | Software informático | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Ease of use and easy design and technical challenge. UI is very user friendly and it allows to also proctor test. > > **Puntos en contra**: Sometimes the portal hangs and I was unable to conduct interview of candidates but their support team is good and they resolved it promptly. > > Its awesome platform with built in tests and challenges which helps a lot and saves time for interviews. ----- ### "A Powerful Platform for Technical Hiring" — 5.0/5 > **Breejesh** | *5 de marzo de 2026* | Seguridad e investigaciones | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: What I liked most about HackerRank is its comprehensive coding environment and large library of programming challenges that help developers practice and improve their skills. The platform makes it easy to create and customize coding tests for different roles, which is very useful for technical hiring. The live coding interview feature is also smooth and interactive, allowing candidates and interviewers to collaborate in real time. Overall, it provides a structured and practical way to evaluate programming ability across multiple technologies. > > **Puntos en contra**: One drawback of HackerRank is that the pricing for advanced recruiting features can be relatively high for small teams or startups. There could also be more flexibility in the bundles of test takers allowed, which would make the platform more accessible for organizations with varying hiring needs. Additionally, customer support response times could be improved in some cases to provide quicker assistance when issues arise. > > Overall, my experience with HackerRank has been positive. It is a powerful platform for coding practice, technical assessments, and developer skill evaluation. The platform’s problem library and live coding interview tools make it valuable for both learners and organizations conducting technical hiring. While the interface and pricing could be improved, it remains one of the most reliable platforms for coding challenges and developer assessments. ----- ### "Outstanding Partnership and Value" — 5.0/5 > **Georgia** | *27 de febrero de 2026* | Software informático | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: How it enabled us to scale and to improve our processes. The platform is incredibly easy to navigate and use. It gives us a great window into how someone will perform in their interviews and shifting to live coding interviews has been game changing. > > **Puntos en contra**: In the interviews the video aspect isn't great and could potentially be smoother if it ran through Google Meet instead. > > Hugely positive. The team are great and very responsive, they are as invested as we are to innovate and overcome challenges and this makes for a fantastic partnership. Working with them has allowed us to run new processes, have reliable data to back up changes and trust in what we are trying to build - together. Excellent value for money, helping us to save vast amounts whilst not faltering on quality. ----- ### "Hackerrank review" — 5.0/5 > **Rajul** | *18 de junio de 2026* | Redes informáticas | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: \* Scalable technical assessments that allow evaluation of large candidate pools efficiently. \* Objective and standardized evaluation, helping reduce bias in the screening process. \* Wide library of role-based questions across coding, SQL, AI/ML, security, and other technical domain > > **Puntos en contra**: Extremely hard DSA \* Competitive programming questions \* Questions that feel unrelated to the actual role > > Overall, our experience with HackerRank has been positive. The platform has enabled us to efficiently assess technical talent at scale through standardized and objective evaluations. Its extensive question library, assessment customization options, and integrity features have helped improve the quality of candidate screening while reducing manual effort ----- ### "Strong Platform for Technical Hiring" — 3.0/5 > **Sayali** | *7 de mayo de 2026* | Aerolíneas/aviación | Valoración de la recomendación: 7.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Real Time Test Monitoring, Flagging code duplicates, Plagarism, Gives good filteration of candidates > > **Puntos en contra**: UI is not good, Its lags alot, keeps on parsing, shows red notifications, report download takes time, very slow > > Overall it solves the purpose to get creame candidates for technical development roles, Real Time monitoring candidate's activiy, Flagging the plagarism, Many types of coding questions for all levels, good opportunity for hiring managers to select. ----- Página: 1 de 5\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.mx/software/143549/hackerrank?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.mx/software/143549/hackerrank) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Datos estructurados