--- description: ¿Qué es y para qué sirve SkillPanel? Lee opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características, precios de planes, ventajas y desventajas. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: ¿Qué es SkillPanel? - Reseñas, precios y funciones - Capterra México 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Herramientas de pruebas de selección](/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) > [SkillPanel](/software/147881/devskiller) # SkillPanel Canonical: https://www.capterra.mx/software/147881/devskiller Página: 1 de 3\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.mx/software/147881/devskiller?page=2) > Devskiller es una plataforma de evaluación y entrevista en línea desarrollada por la metodología RealLifeTesting. > > Veredicto: 54 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.8/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa SkillPanel? Empresas de TI y empresas con departamento de TI para probar a los desarrolladores en el proceso de contratación, escuelas de codificación y educadores de TI para fines de educación, evaluación y certificación. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.8/5** | 54 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.7/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.7/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.3/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.6/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: DevSkiller - **Constitución**: 2013 ## Contexto comercial - **Modelo de precios**: (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-5,000, 5,001-10,000, 10,000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Afganistán, Albania, Alemania, Andorra, Angola, Anguila, Antigua y Barbuda, Arabia Saudita, Argelia, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaiyán, Bahamas, Bangladés, Barbados, Baréin, Belice y 209 más ## Funciones - Biblioteca de preguntas - Biblioteca de pruebas predefinidas - Clasificación automática - Comparación de candidatos - Contratación de personal - Creación de informes/análisis - Creación de test/quiz - Encuestas y comentarios - Evaluaciones individualizadas - Evaluación - Evaluación de habilidades - Gestión de candidatos - Gestión de evaluaciones - Gestión del rendimiento - Importación y exportación de datos - Modelos - Preguntas personalizables - Prueba previa a la contratación - Pruebas en línea - Seguimiento de candidatos - Tests personalizables - Tests/Evaluaciones ## Integraciones (en total: 7) - Greenhouse - JazzHR - Lever - SmartRecruiters - Teamtailor - Tellent Recruitee - Workable ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Chat ## Categoría - [Herramientas de pruebas de selección](https://www.capterra.mx/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Herramientas de pruebas de selección](https://www.capterra.mx/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) - [Software de evaluación](https://www.capterra.mx/directory/31117/assessment/software) - [Software de talento humano](https://www.capterra.mx/directory/10029/talent-management/software) - [Software de reclutamiento](https://www.capterra.mx/directory/30602/recruiting/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Criteria](https://www.capterra.mx/software/119740/criteria) — 4.7/5 (188 reviews) 2. [Talview](https://www.capterra.mx/software/142374/talview) — 4.2/5 (42 reviews) 3. [TestGorilla](https://www.capterra.mx/software/203823/testgorilla) — 4.1/5 (265 reviews) 4. [Manatal](https://www.capterra.mx/software/181145/manatal) — 4.6/5 (141 reviews) 5. [Paycor](https://www.capterra.mx/software/133745/paycor-perform) — 4.3/5 (3033 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Good site for testing candidates" — 4.0/5 > **Gert Jan** | *14 de septiembre de 2018* | Software informático | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The possibility to define your own tasks and tests. There are a lot of different types of questions and different platforms that are supported. > > **Puntos en contra**: To make your own programming tasks you have to upload a zip-file with a project. If something is wrong, you don't get very clear error messages. > > We use Devskiller to test candidates that apply for a job. It helps us to check whether they have the knowledge they need for their job. ----- ### "Pre-screen candidates with relevant questions" — 5.0/5 > **Bryan** | *20 de abril de 2018* | Arte y artesanía | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Out of the box, we're supplied with relevant questions and programming solutions we can customize a test with. It didn't take long at all for us to get a list of questions the team liked together in a test, and start testing candidates in our funnel. There's a large pool of format of questions- we don't need to format the coding questions into weird multiple choice questions where you select the correct code as other platforms have you do. Along the same vein, we can have the candidate complete coding projects that are similar to work our developers do each day: find and fix the existing bug(s), implement a new feature, or perform a code review (similar to Bitbucket or Github pull request code reviews). We ended up writing a few of our own questions, which wasn't difficult, that allowed us to test candidates how they'd perform against some of our own code. The code reviews especially have been great at determining the candidate's skill level based on the feedback they give. Being able to have the candidate download/upload code from Devskiller so they can modify it in their own IDE, or allowing them to grab the code from a temporary Github repository is a big plus. > > **Puntos en contra**: Some bugs had come up, such as not being able to turn on/off an option in a test question. These were resolved quickly in a few hours after sending an email to the support email. The test isn't fully automated for some types of questions (as you would expect for code reviews), but there's also not a way to give automatic partial credit on multiple-choice questions. This requires us to go through the test questions individually to give partial credit (4 / 5 correct doesn't seem like a 0% to us), but the time isn't significant. Brackets seem to break the SQL questions, which is odd and hangs some candidates up. > > We've cut down the amount of in-person interviews we need to hold by 65+% by being able to realize what the level of experience the candidate demonstrates within code very similar to our own. When we do bring in a candidate, we have a good baseline idea of where their skillset it at, and can tailor the in-person interview to allow us to determine the candidate's rate-of-growth and dive deeper into what they know. ----- ### "review" — 4.0/5 > **Anna** | *17 de mayo de 2023* | Tecnología y servicios de la información | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: skill map is a very useful tool to present the skills across the organisation > > **Puntos en contra**: skillsets are a rather difficult concept and sometimes it is difficult to operate using them > > positive but demanding ----- ### "Hiring candidates with devskiller" — 5.0/5 > **Francois** | *12 de junio de 2023* | Fabricación de productos eléctricos/electrónicos | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The flexibility of the type of test, the in-browser developer experience, the number of pre-defined test that gets updated all the time makes devSkiller the best way for us to best assess and improve candidate in our projects. > > **Puntos en contra**: The candidature management is hard when dealing with a large among of candidates. note taking, grouping could be a nice add-on. > > As soon as we got devSkiller in our hiring process, we saw a direct improvement of our developer and code quality in our project. It helped us better target our candidates and skills we needed and gain a huge among of time in the hiring process. ----- ### "My experience with Devskiller" — 4.0/5 > **Agata** | *9 de mayo de 2023* | Tecnología y servicios de la información | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Easy of use, graphical representation of skills-skill map, analytics tab- ability to generate reports, ability to integrate with other applications in the company, good cooperation with Devskiller. > > **Puntos en contra**: Unintuitive place where tutorials are placed in the tool. ----- Página: 1 de 3\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.mx/software/147881/devskiller?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.mx/software/147881/devskiller) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Datos estructurados