Fusion Framework System

Por Fusion Risk Management

¿Quién usa Fusion Framework System?

Organizations that want to achieve operational resilience.

¿Qué es Fusion Framework System?

The Fusion Framework System enables your organization to become more resilient by integrating business continuity and risk management in one platform. Our software lets you know what is holding you back and helps you move forward with new opportunities to increase revenue, create efficiency, mitigate risk, and protect customer trust.

Información sobre Fusion Framework System

Fusion Risk Management

http://www.fusionrm.com/

Fundada en 2006

Resumen de precios de Fusion Framework System

Fusion Framework System no tiene versión gratuita, pero ofrece una prueba gratis.

Vídeo de Fusion Framework System
Play
-thumb
-thumb
-thumb
-thumb
-thumb

Detalles de precios

Please contact Fusion Risk Management for pricing details

Versión gratuita

No

Prueba gratis

Implementación

En la nube, SaaS, web

Móvil: nativo de iOS

Móvil: nativo de Android

Formación

En persona

En vivo en línea

Seminarios web

Documentación

Asistencia

Horas laborables

En línea

Funciones de Fusion Framework System

  • Auditoría
  • Conformidad medioambiental
  • Gestión de controles internos
  • Gestión de incidentes
  • Gestión de políticas
  • Gestión de riesgo de TI
  • Gestión de riesgos operativos
  • Recuperación de desastres

Lista completa de Software de GRC

  • Acciones preventivas y correctivas (CAPA)
  • Conformidad con la OSHA
  • Creación de informes de incidentes
  • Gestión de incidencias informáticas
  • Gestión de incidentes de seguridad
  • Gestión de investigaciones
  • Gestión de tareas
  • Recuperación de desastres
  • Registro de auditoría

Lista completa de Software de gestión de incidentes

  • Gestión de abastecimiento
  • Gestión de la conformidad
  • Historial de transacciones
  • Métricas de rendimiento
  • Offboarding
  • Pago a proveedores
  • Portal de autoservicio
  • Registro de auditoría

Lista completa de Software de gestión de proveedores

  • Evaluación de riesgos
  • Gestión de auditorías
  • Gestión de incidentes
  • Gestión de la conformidad
  • Gestión de la seguridad
  • Gestión de proveedores
  • Gestión de riesgo de TI
  • Gestión de riesgos operativos
  • Panel de comunicaciones
  • Recuperación de desastres

Lista completa de Software de gestión de riesgos integrado

  • Acceso móvil
  • Acciones preventivas y correctivas (CAPA)
  • Alertas y notificaciones
  • Análisis predictivo
  • Auditoría
  • Control de procesos empresariales
  • Evaluación de riesgos
  • Gestión de controles internos
  • Gestión de excepciones
  • Gestión de la conformidad
  • Gestión de respuestas
  • Gestión de riesgo de TI
  • Gestión de riesgos contra la reputación
  • Gestión de riesgos legales
  • Gestión de riesgos operativos

Lista completa de Software para gestión de riesgos

Alternativas a Fusion Framework System

Más alternativas a Fusion Framework System

Opiniones de Fusion Framework System

Todas las opiniones

Calificación general

4.5/5

Evaluación media

Facilidad de uso 4.2
Atención al cliente 4.4
Funcionalidades 4.3
Relación calidad-precio 4.4

Evaluar software

Comparte tus experiencias con otros compradores de software.

¡Escribe una reseña!
Usuario verificado
Global Head of Business Continuity, IT Continuity and Technology Risk on Third Parties
Banca, 10,000+ empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
  • Calificación global
    5 /5
  • Facilidad de uso
    5 /5
  • Características y funcionalidades
    4 /5
  • Asistencia técnica
    5 /5
  • Relación calidad-precio
    5 /5
  • Probabilidad de recomendación
    9/10
  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 27/10/2020

"A rich-feautred platform to oversight our Operational Resilience shortcomings"

Comentarios: We started with a basic implementation of the tool for a specific need and we found a flexible companion for mapping and enriching our understanding of our risks. The platform is really expansible and allows you to build and to gradually enrich features and data. The platform does not impose any methodology and adapts to the evolution of our operational resilience vision and organizational needs.

Puntos a favor: FUSION is a flexible utility that allows our company to build our vision on resilience capabilities in a flexible way, gradually, without additional hidden costs (licenses and development).

Contras: FUSION could come with additional pre-defined modules and templates for immediate implementation and piloting in big organization. Storage on a cloud comes with inevitable questions on security, even if supported by certifications and scrutiny performed by the provider.

  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 27/10/2020
Vicky M.
Risk Management & Business Resilience Director
Telecomunicaciones, 201-500 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
  • Calificación global
    5 /5
  • Facilidad de uso
    3 /5
  • Características y funcionalidades
    5 /5
  • Asistencia técnica
    4 /5
  • Relación calidad-precio
    4 /5
  • Probabilidad de recomendación
    10/10
  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 3/2/2020

"Fabulous Fusion Framework"

Comentarios: It took us time to set up and integrate all of our data, but just plan development for all but one of the 40 teams, went from estimated 3-5 days, down to 1 day. That is BIA data collection in the AM and BCP in the PM. We had basic plans with requirements done in 1 day! This saved us 10K hours of team time during the first year. We have been thrilled with the automation both on the planning side and on the Risk Management side.

Puntos a favor: That it is so flexible and configurable. We have very specific requirements based on our risk models and this platform allows us to meet every single one.

Contras: The classic version is dated, but moving to the Lightening is improving our end user experience. It is also somewhat difficult to learn some of the concepts of relational data, how they integrate and are maximized for those who don't have a background in software back ends. Having said that, I'm not a developer and can do most of my own configurations.

  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 3/2/2020
Michael O.
Risk Consultant
Seguros, 10,000+ empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de un año
  • Calificación global
    3 /5
  • Facilidad de uso
    3 /5
  • Características y funcionalidades
    3 /5
  • Asistencia técnica
    Sin valoración
  • Relación calidad-precio
    Sin valoración
  • Probabilidad de recomendación
    7/10
  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 31/1/2020

"One year of implementation"

Puntos a favor: Some automation has been helpful to making processes go further. It's also useful to have more data in a single database.

Contras: Many processes using it are more complicated than what we had done in the past and requires numerous workarounds.

  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 31/1/2020
Ed B.
Executive Director BCP
Seguros, 1001-5000 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de un año
  • Calificación global
    5 /5
  • Facilidad de uso
    5 /5
  • Características y funcionalidades
    4 /5
  • Asistencia técnica
    4 /5
  • Relación calidad-precio
    5 /5
  • Probabilidad de recomendación
    10/10
  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 31/1/2020

"Fusion Framework System, by Ed Brown"

Comentarios: Improved crisis management and communication during events. We call these response plans which are activated based on the level of the event and are a prelude to a recovery plan activation.

Puntos a favor: I love the simplicity as an administrator to make changes, within my knowledge limits and the use of Fuel Hours to supplement my knowledge gaps. There were very view, but some, implementation problems. Fusion listens to their clients and has since improved their implementation process. I presented a complex model to determine the process RTO based 9 impact categories over time. They delivered what I wanted. Of course, I think, everyone client would want this model and it should be a separate object because it did eat up a lot of our available custom fields in the process object. We are working with Fusion to pull that part out and create a new object or leverage a lesser used object. I really like the incident management object.

Contras: I think there should have been standard dashboarding out of the box. All clients implement a program with a BCP life cycle and dashboard are used to help user and program managers manage compliance to the annual deliverables. Instead these were created with fuel hours. (scale 1-10, 1 being not a big deal to 10 being horrible - this is a 2.) I am also accustom to having a BIA (Process) review with a maintenance control and we used fuel hours to enhance this for a BIA approval section. I think that should be standard. (scale 1-10, 1 being not a big deal to 10 being horrible - this is a 4.) Lastly plan conga generator and its templates are not well designed and we have had several changes requested to make them design the way we want them. Fusion could spend more time on the conga templates clients may like. (scale 1-10, 1 being not a big deal to 10 being horrible - this is a 7.) All these cons are correctable and have been and which is why I added the first PRO above.

  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 31/1/2020
Brian W.
Sr. Disaster Recovery Admin.
Salud, bienestar y deporte, 1001-5000 empleados
Ha utilizado el software durante: Más de dos años
  • Calificación global
    5 /5
  • Facilidad de uso
    4 /5
  • Características y funcionalidades
    5 /5
  • Asistencia técnica
    4 /5
  • Relación calidad-precio
    5 /5
  • Probabilidad de recomendación
    9/10
  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 6/2/2020

"Fusion Framework System"

Comentarios: The tool works well for our BC and IT plan management. We have taken the next step to use the tool for our disaster recovery exercise monitoring. We are monitoring our exercises and proof of concepts manually and we will eventually implement the Service now connection that will allow us to track, monitor and delegate tasks once an incident is triggered and the plans are executed. We are looking to use the tool too its full capability.

Puntos a favor: Plan configuration and management, Incident management, Processes, Library Procedure Group options, Dashboard for reports, Application and Component records. We were looking to replace our old LDRPS and this was clearly a better tool.

Contras: The inability to remove/delete user accounts.

  • Fuente de la reseña 
  • Publicado el 6/2/2020